Deep polarization in this country has raised the stakes higher than ever for campus leaders who might consider weighing in or taking a stand on any issue. Under competing demands, when do you invoke or preserve institutional neutrality? When and how do you respond to current events and endorse or denounce certain ideas?
This conversation among premium subscribers will be meeting-style. Here is the agenda:
12:00 p.m. — Q&A on recent Chroniclesurvey data from college presidents about speaking out
12:30 p.m. — Peer-led breakout discussions to share advice (off the record)
Join us to discuss with fellow higher-ed leaders:
What guidelines prove useful in deciding whether to take a position on a contested issue
Different forms of speaking out
Weighing expectations for controversy
Responding to constituents’ competing demands
Fill out the form to reserve your virtual seat
Now scheduled for: Tuesday, December 6
12 p.m. ET
By registering for this forum, you agree to share the information below with The Chronicle for marketing purposes. View The Chronicle's privacy policy here: chronicle.com/privacypolicy
Host:
Laura Krantz Subscriber Product Editor, The Chronicle
Speakers:
Eric Kelderman Senior Reporter, The Chronicle
Sandro Galea Dean, Boston University School of Public Health
Brian Rosenberg President Emeritus, Macalester College President in Residence, Harvard Graduate School of Education
Discussion Leaders:
Biddy Martin President Emerita, Amherst College Former Chancellor, University of Wisconsin at Madison
Holden Thorp Editor-in-chief, Science Former Chancellor, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill