.
Generative artificial intelligence promises to replace (or at least approximate) human work. So how do humans on college campuses feel about this new technology?
The Chronicle asked 404 higher-ed leaders to share their perspectives on generative AI. Their responses were a mixed bag:
The Chronicle asked 404 higher-ed leaders to share their perspectives on generative AI. Their responses were a mixed bag:
- 78 percent agree that AI offers new ways to improve higher education.
- 60 percent of leaders think AI poses a threat to higher education.
- 84 percent of respondents say their institution is worried about AI-powered cheating.
For most, they believe that teaching is where AI will have the most positive impact. Get the latest Research Brief to understand the complex (and often contradictory) feelings driving decisions about AI.
.
Generative artificial intelligence promises to replace (or at least approximate) human work. So how do humans on college campuses feel about this new technology?
The Chronicle asked 404 higher-ed leaders to share their perspectives on generative AI. Their responses were a mixed bag:
The Chronicle asked 404 higher-ed leaders to share their perspectives on generative AI. Their responses were a mixed bag:
- 78 percent agree that AI offers new ways to improve higher education.
- 60 percent of leaders think AI poses a threat to higher education.
- 84 percent of respondents say their institution is worried about AI-powered cheating.
For most, they believe that teaching is where AI will have the most positive impact. Get the latest Research Brief to understand the complex (and often contradictory) feelings driving decisions about AI.
.
.
By submitting this form, you agree to share your information with The Chronicle for marketing purposes.